Greensboro Massacre

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Greensboro Massacre. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Greensboro Massacre paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Greensboro Massacre, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Greensboro Massacre paper at

Our affordable prices!

On (1)November 3rd, 1979 a devastating massacre took place in (1)Greensborough, North Carolina. The (2)assimilative mentality that the Ku Klux Klan possessed caused a clash in Greensboro. The Klan (2)believed that they were superior over any other group. They believed that they were the only ones that belonged in Greensboro and so decided to get rid of anyone that was different. At first, the Klan mainly directed their energy to the wiping out of people of black race; however, later they then included Jews and Catholics. Bernard Butkovich, an agent who came to North Carolina to investigate the possession and use of illegal automatic weapons, (3)encouraged the Klan to kill rival Klansmen. Since the CWP had (3)rallied the China (3)Grove community against the Klan and had also humiliated them by (3)burning up their flag, the Klan made it a point to have their revenge on the CWP. The (3)CWP became frustrated with all the injustice that was going on in Greensboro and challenged the Klan publicly. Nelson Johnson organized and led a (3)"Death to the Klan" parade and rally. The parade and rally were well planned, but the duly cooperation of Greensboro's Police was the cause for all mishaps that were to happen on that day. The police had promised to meet the CWP at Carver and Everett Streets in Greensboro's black community at 10a.m. with the exception that none of the marchers would carry guns or large sticks. However, the police were not there. It wasn't until after the Klansmen came with firearms and attacked the CWP when the police arrived. By this time, five CWP had already been shot dead. Furthermore, the police began to arrest the 'communists' instead of the real criminals, the Klansmen. It was later found out that the point of origin of the parade had been given to Dawson two days before the rally. Dawson used this information to join up the Klansmen and plan an attack on the CWP. He also made sure of it that there would be no police intervention at the massacre. In 1980, six Klansmen were tried for murder. Unfortunate for the CWP the case was view by an all white jury. The Klansmen (8)claimed that they were only defending themselves and nothing came of the case. There was then a second trial where the CWP were prosecuting the Klan under a civil rights law that required proof of racism as the motive for killing. However, the (8)defense manipulated this law by stating that their motive was not racial, but was political as they only wanted to shoot communist that day—not blacks. Once again, nothing came of that trial. However, the third and final trial was successful and monetary rewards were given to families of the victims of the Greensboro massacre.

(4)The documentary clearly singles out the Ku Klux Klan as the "oldest terrorist group in America." I agree with this statement, as the definition for terrorist is 'one who causes violent dread." The Ku Klux Klan was a society which lawlessly terrorized blacks as well as Jews and Catholics. They would ruthlessly bring fear into the lives of innocent blacks, Jews, and Catholics simply because they wanted to promote white supremacy. They would even kill to get across the view that whites were better, or rather that everyone that belonged to their society was better that everyone else.

(5)Discrimination are policies and practices that harm a group and its members. In the documentary, the practice that the Ku Klux Klan had may be considered as discrimination. Their assimilative point of view gave them the will power to even kill others that were not of their race or culture. This practice of killing blacks because they wanted white superiority is most definitely a source of discrimination.

(5)Prejudice is devaluating a group because of its assumed behavior, values, abilities, or attribute. In the documentary, the Ku Klux Klan can once again be seen as the bad guys. The Ku Klux Klan devalued the blacks, Jews, and Catholics, for they assumed that blacks, Jews, and Catholics were inferior beings compared to Klansmen simply because of racial and cultural differences.

Order essays on Greensboro Massacre and other topics

(6)Attitudinal discrimination can be seen in the documentary whereby the Ku Klux Klan discriminated in many forms against the blacks, Jews, and Catholics. The Ku Klux Klan discriminated against the blacks, Jews, and Catholics for prejudicial reasons, and so it may be seen as an attitudinal discrimination.

(6)Institutional discrimination can be seen in the documentary whereby laws were such that whites were allowed superiority in the sense that they could have easily gotten away with anything. In the case of the Ku Klux Klan vs. CWP simple glitches in the law allowed the accused Klansmen to walk away free. Klansmen (whites) were paid better wages than blacks. The political figures such as the police were on the side of the Klansmen, for they did not intervene when the horrible massacre was occurring. All these are examples whereby policies allow injustice which may even cause harm to a certain group.

(6)A form of de facto discrimination seen in the documentary is the discrimination by which the Ku Klux Klan hung blacks. Killing is definitely no legal; however, the Klansmen still perform mast murder and kill blacks simply because they do not like them.

(6)A form of de jure discrimination seen in the documentary is the capability of the Ku Klux Klan to kill people and get away with it by stating that they did not kill them because of race, but that they only wanted to shoot communists, as they were outsiders, troublemakers, and race mixers.

(7)The fact that there was an "only-white-jury" chosen to decide the fate of the accused can serve as a benefit as well as a disadvantage. For instance, should the jury be persuaded by the plaintiff, it would then mean than a group of Klansmen actually betrayed their kind and can see the other side of the picture. This would then probably lead to the beginning of a whole new change where as the war between Klansmen and Communist ends. In this way it may serve as an advantage. However, it may be see as a disadvantage where as the jury remain unmoved and bias. This would then be unfair to the CWP, for then it would be and unjust trial based on bias on the part of the jury.

(9)The killing of five people in the USA is labeled the same as the killing of 70 peasants in Bosnia, for slaves are only counted as a percentage of the population. However, once determining the severity of the situation it would seem that the killing of 70 people in Bosnia has a greater weight as the number of deaths in Bosnia is 14 times more than that in the USA. Both situations may be seen as massacres as they involve ruthless slaughters. The only differences is the number of individual beings that had been killed, and to me that is a significant difference in that 5 people can never be equal to 70. I believe that no matter what status a person has, they should be counted as their own being and not as a fraction. Sure a lost of any kind is severe, but I believe that should the amount of lost increase so should the severity of the situation. They go hand in hand.

(10)Should I ever get such an opportunity as to penalize someone guilty of a crime related to discrimination or prejudice, I would have the criminal spend at least 4-weeks in a jail cell along with someone of the race that he is prejudice or discriminates against. The period of sentence would also depend on the severity of the crime committed. The worst the crime committed is; the longer the sentence. This punishment will hopefully enlighten his views.

Please note that this sample paper on Greensboro Massacre is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Greensboro Massacre, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Greensboro Massacre will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!