If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss paper at
Our affordable prices!
"Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss
The threat of Nuclear Weapons has certainly not gone unnoticed, with the fear ever present in the global scene. Individuals view the world significantly has been altered with the emergence of nuclear weapons. Deterrence is when "decision makers in one nation seek to prevent certain actions by potential adversaries by threatening them with military retaliation." Nuclear weapons have certainly become a means of deterring unwanted action, particularly during the Post World War II era, however they have not prevented war. During the Cold War nuclear weapons undoubtfully prohibited mass war between the two super powers, the USA and the USSR, who were ever increasing their military capacity. However it did not prelude them from fighting proxy wars, as was evident in the Vietnam War. Furthermore it has certainly not prevented war at present with both the war on terror and the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Nuclear weapons have changed the capacity of warfare, although it has not been evident in any conflicts throughout the world so far, who is to say that it won't occur in the future, because the potential is obviously there.
Nuclear deterrence has kept the world from mass war, particularly during the
Cold War were it prevented a large scale conflict between the USA and the USSR.
Essay service for your "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss paper
Nuclear deterrence in the Post World War II era was based on mutual threats as each side
threatened that if it were attacked, it would retaliate in kind with a nuclear strike. During
this period each superpower could survive a surprise attack just long enough to launch a
counter strike which would result in both sides suffering devastating destruction. "Thus
both were mutually deterred from provoking a hot war" The use of nuclear weapons was
and is seen as the last resort, because few if any political ends could be gained by it, their
primary function was to pose a threat to potential enemies. During this time however, the
world did come close to a final nuclear war, as was particularly evident with the Cuban
Missile Crisis, where the USSR bought nuclear weapons into communist Cuba. The
effects of a nuclear war would be devastating, if deterrence failed and the superpowers attacked one another "the target nations would almost certainly cease to exist as
functioning societies." Furthermore unlike previous World Wars were the casualties
numbered in their millions, after a thermonuclear war the deaths would number in their
billions. Nations far from the line of fire would likely be destroyed, and there certainly
would be no bystanders. Fortunately their was no nuclear attack during this time, and the
two superpowers were able to prevent it from occurring. Holsti believes that the most
evident requirement for effective Deterrence is the possession of efficient military
capacity to carry out the threatened retaliation, in addition the deterrence must also be
stable and credible. Finally adversaries must also "impress enemy leaders of their
intentions without provoking a preventive or preemptive strike out of fear" . Nuclear
Deterrence kept us from another world war between the USA and the USSR, as the
effects of a strike would have been so disastrous for all parties involved.
However effective deterrence did not avert the world from war, during the Cold
War and at present many smaller conflicts have and are taking place. During the Cold
War the most evident being the Vietnam War which took place from 161 to 175.
Although the basic motivation behind many of the conflicts was a form of rivalry
between the two superpowers fighting for an ideology, the Vietnam War was to an extent
a proxy war. Some may argue that the genesis of the Vietnam War was essentially a
nationalist one rather then the downward thrust of communism. It is the generally
accepted opinion that the essential motives of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese
government attacking the South Vietnamese government were to unify the nation.
However former US president J. Kennedy was adamant that the USA would contain the
spread of communism throughout South East Asia by defending the South Vietnamese
government from communist aggression. This conflict during the Cold war, fortunately
did not contain the use of nuclear weapons however America still used chemical
defoliants and Napalm. This is a thick liquid which usually contains petrol, it was
designed to clear away the undergrowth so the USA could see who was supplying the
National Liberation Front with weapons, Unfortunately this liquid also stuck to people's
skin and burned away their flesh. The Vietnam War was a very horrific war, with 57,000
US solders killed together with many Vietnamese; however it was certainly not as
destructive as a nuclear war would have been. Nuclear deterrence did not and has not
prevented the world from war, as was evident with the Vietnam War and by the many
conflicts we see around the world today.
Nuclear Deterrence was ultimately effective in precluding mass war in the past
and the progress in disarmament was somewhat positive. However with the recent
developments, is deterrence possible in the future? In the past we have seen some
positive attempts to reduce the Worlds nuclear capacity for example the Moscow pact
and the treaty between the USA and the USSR in 17 and of course the very well
known Strategic Arms Limitation talks (START I and START II) which began in 11.
However the recent developments with America's anti-missile defense shield may bring
the threat of nuclear war back into the picture. Bush argues that "new concepts of
deterrence, have to replace… the idea of mutually assured destruction" however many
believe that it may destroy existing nuclear agreements and trigger a new nuclear arms
race. Using radar receptors and coordinating with ground based radar transmitters, the
missile defense system is suppose to find incoming threats and destroy them before they
reach the USA, although this may work in theory there is still no guarantee of its
reliability. Furthermore Bush has suggested that he will share his advanced technology
with Japan, Americas NATO allies and South Korea. This in its self causes problems
because some of Americas so called friends will want to know why they haven't been
given the technology and "can America say with certainty that the technology it gives to
one country will not end up in the hands of another. History suggests not." This
extremely dimensional issue has once again bought nuclear war back in the limelight and
although nuclear weapons deterred mass war in the past, who is to say that the future
holds the same outcome. Is our safety worth risking to find out?
When matters of defense become so great that one nation is able to cease
life on Earth, we certainly realize that foreign policy and security has been changed
forever. Although Nuclear Deterrence kept the world from mass war during the past, it
certainly did not prevent smaller more confined conflicts, not in the past nor the present.
Furthermore with the recent developments regarding the Missile Defense Shield, is the
USA starting another arms race and once again putting the world in great danger and
uncertainty, only time will tell.
Please note that this sample paper on "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on "Nuclear Deterrence has kept the world from war". Discuss will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.