Me

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Me. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Me paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Me, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Me paper at affordable prices !

As an Iranian-American I have been influenced by the American culture as well as the Iranian culture. Both of my parents were raised in Iran, and they were of the few immigrants who came to the U.S. in their early 0's and did not become Americanized. The culture in Iran compared to the United States is very different. People dress differently, people act differently, and people have different standards. Generally, the Iranian culture is very conservative. In Iran people are very particular about education and so are my parents. They stress this very much and it has become a priority for me.

My family follows their culture quite closely so I have to make the same commitment. Even though education is the main concern of my parents, it is not an issue because it is what I am striving for also. I am finishing high school a year early, and I am in a process of getting guaranteed transfers to several universities. Even though I follow the same terms that they do at home I am totally different at school and around my friends. At home I tend swallow my pride so that my parents have unconditional respect that the Iranian culture emphasizes. At school and away from the family I have the urge to let it all out, and be as loud and obnoxious as I want to be. To my friends I am the loud, little nerd, and to my family I am a party animal. The differences yet that seem so similar but different at the same time are that I live with their culture away from my family but without it when I am with them.

It is more than instinct for me to find a reason to rebel in that kind of small way. It gives me a special sentimental feeling that is better to live with than without. My parents have spent their whole lives pressuring their culture onto me because for them it seems that my life would be easier with it. I have adapted their culture and used it to customize my own personality, yet I still do not fully follow it because in this day and age it is practically impossible. With the culture that my parents grew up in, they didn't have much communication with members of the opposite sex unless they were family. I do not get along with members of my own sex very well, most of my friends tend to be boys because they are more easy-going, and I tend to have a better time with them. Other than that the rest of their culture is mostly bearable and livable.

My dad grew up in a very poor family and my mom in a rich family. This is also another reason why it is hard to adapt to both of my parents culture's at the same time. They were both from a different class. My father lived in a house were there was no running water, and yet he attended the most prestigious University in Iran. He was the first person in his family to get a high-school diploma. He got his bachelors degree and then got a scholarship to Stanford University, where he got his masters degree and later his PhD. My mother did not come from a poor family; in fact it was quite the opposite. She went to Europe, just for fun, and decided to stay. Later on she came to the U.S. where she decided to study. She went to school and got her masters degree. From both of my parents come two completely different heritages, both which I have adapted to myself and mixed to fit my own personality. They both push for a very high education. With their influence my goal is to become one of the people in my family that takes our class and status higher like my mother and father did.

I have come from a rich spoiled family and a hard working poor family. I have grown up with people who understand the importance of education, and who have made it a goal for me to get the best education that I can. Even though I am very influenced by my parents and they have affected me in the greatest way but not enough to change my own personal ideas. My personality is the one I was born with. I take in my parent's culture and heritage as opinions and when I see a good use for them I keep them. If not I throw it out the window and live life the way I feel comfortable. I live and I abide by my own culture.

Please note that this sample paper on Me is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Me, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Me will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband paper at

Our affordable prices!

Barrie reinterprets the state of marriage, what it means to her, and the benefits associated with having a husband. She bucks Warners idea that the institution of same-sex marriage is always an ideology of normalization. Barrie does not seek a commitment ceremony with Linnea because she wants to uphold a heterosexual image of purity or to become civilized. Rather, Barrie acknowledges her current politics and the queer politics of her past. Barrie proves that mainstream gay and lesbian concerns do not ignore the queer politics. Warners assumption that the two cannot work together provides a dichotomy of the gay and lesbian movement that creates the same hierarchies he intends to indict.

The benefits of marriage for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are very ambiguous. Barrie embraces marriages ambiguity just as she embraces gender ambiguity. She wants to find ways to appropriate and integrate the best of what already exists. This is done through a more formal recognition of her commitment to Linnea. Barrie is looking to celebrate and demonstrate her interpretation of what marriage is.

When I call Linnea my husband I mean that shes the woman who has to lead when we slow dance, who is compelled to try and dip and twirl me?.when I call her my husband I mean that she is a woman I saw dressed seriously in a skirt and heels just once (6 Borich).

Barries recognition of ambiguity in her relationship status is parallels her acceptance of Linnea and her butch lesbian sexual identification. Barrie points out that Linnea sticks out in public restrooms She is a woman who does not look like a man, yet is often mistaken for one (Borich 7). Just as people mistake Linnea for a man Warner mistakes that all same-sex marriage seekers are actually normalizing to the constraints of heterosexuality.

Essay service for your queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband paper

When Warner argues passionately against same-sex marriage he does so because it perpetuates the cultural shame attached to sex between consenting but unmarried adults, not for the more mainstream reasons like homosexuality denigrates the institution of marriage. Warner claims that when gay men and lesbians try to claim theyre just like normal folk they do a profound disservice to other queer folk who do not choose to live in monogamous or matrimonial bliss. He states that escaping into marriage ignores the problems with societal stigmatization. This is done through simply assimilating into monogamy rather than challenging widespread stigma and homophobia. However, I think this view of marriage is short cited. Warner equates the institution of marriage only with monogamy, chastity, and purity. The three do not always have to be linked.

Barrie and Linneas ceremony and celebration disprove the inherit linkage of marriage and purity that Warner points to. ?our honeymoon entertainment would be front row seats at a topless revue?Its a gay mens chorus with showgirls (Borich 8-). Barrie and Linnea openly embrace their sexual identities and that they are not mainstream. They integrate this belief into not only their celebrations but also the commitment itself. Instead of planning the normal commitment ceremony that Warner describes as a more formal way of coming out and announcing monogamy to family and friends, Barrie and Linnea take off for Las Vegas. A town that embraces sexuality, sexual autonomy, and freer interpretations of love embodies not only Barrie and Linneas relationship but also their queer identity and history. When Barrie asks what could be the reason Linnea and I would choose this trippy place to get married (Borich 40) she provokes questions of normalizing marriage. Instead of bucking her past of break-the-rules sex, drugs, and alcohol she embraces her bad-girl past with a new twist. It wasnt morally wrong or absent her identity as a lesbian now that she was getting married, rather it is part of her identity she still embraces and reinforces that identification by choosing the drug, sex, and sin capital of Las Vegas for her wedding sight.

Barrie proves that the politics of queer theory and current gay and lesbian mainstream movements are not incompatible. Warner states that queer is used to suggest how many people find themselves at odds with straight culture. Inherently, Barrie and Linnea are challenging notions of straight culture. Linneas identification as being a butch lesbian challenges gender constructions and Barries own lesbian identification embraces the spectrum of sexual promiscuity to monogamy and love. The two embrace the role of sex in their marriage instead of marrying to blend their identity. Warner points to the movement and describes the politics of sexual identity versus sex in a negative light.

Sex and identity can simply be confused with each other. So even an expanded catalog of identities can remain blind to the way people suffer, often indiscriminately, norms of sexual practice, and norms of subjective identification (Warner ).

Barrie and Linnea, on the other hand, embrace both identity and sex. The two do not have to be pitted against each other.

Warner goes on to state that once lesbian and gay couples begin to marry and are recognized by the state the gay and lesbian movement will die. He states that marriage is not an effective way of dealing with the stigma associated with homosexuality. On the contrary, I believe the economic benefits associated with marriage and the signal of institutional acceptance will lead to more people coming out of the closet. This is turn, will help more closed minded people to realize how many people do not sexually identify as heterosexual. The only proven way to end discrimination I have seen is through personal contact. Growing up in a Midwestern conservative environment exposed me to many bigoted beliefs. The openness of a few individuals in my school changed many more minds than any marriage law would. If the institution supports the practice it will become more recognized. The more people that come out, the more people are exposed to different interpretations of sexual identity. True sexual autonomy means equality. Although Barrie and Linnea received no state recognition of their marriage it sent a signal of their identities.

Barrie and Linnea merged thoughts of mainstream gay rights advocates and their identification with queer politics. Warners assumption that the two cannot work together provides a dichotomy that pits the mainstream gay and lesbian movement against people who identify with queer culture. By classifying one movement as good, effective, and radical and the other as mainstream, misguided, and cosmetic he denies the importance of mainstream lesbian and gay movements. If sexual autonomy is inherently important Warner should recognize that institutional recognition of this autonomy is not completely cosmetic. Tangible benefits such as health care and legal rights are addressed by the mainstream movement. The queer movement also addresses health issues when dealing with HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. The two causes share similar concerns. The division of the two creates the same hierarchies of homo and hetero-sexuality that Warner intends to indict. By privileging one movement Warner reinforces an image of what gay and lesbian identities should look like. Barries attitude towards marriage proves the two can be merged.

Please note that this sample paper on queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on queer theory: a comparison of Warner's normalization theory to My Lesbian Husband will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

How far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy?

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy? paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy? paper at

Our affordable prices!

How Far Were Romeo and Juliet's deaths a Tragedy?

By s Pascoe.

This essay will discuss Romeo and Juliet, an extremely famous play by the Sixteenth Century playwright, William Shakespeare. The play introduces us to two families; the Capulets and the Montagues who are have long been sworn enemies. The first act of the play contains a claim that Capulets are better than Montagues, and with a fight between the two houses. Unfortunately, two young members of the feuding families fall in love- Juliet first sets eyes on Romeo at a Capulet party that the young Montague Romeo has sneaked into. Juliet does not care that Romeo is Montague; she says, "That which we call a Rose/ By any other word would smell as sweet" (ii.ii. 44). The youngsters marry secretly with the help of Friar Lawrence, and when Juliet is arranged to be married to somebody else, they hatch a plan to save her. Juliet drinks a poison to fake her own death and thus avoid the ceremony, but there is a flaw in her plot. Romeo (who is in exile following a fight with the Capulets) fails to receive the letter informing him that Juliet is not really dead but asleep, and so believes that she has died. When he arrives at her tomb, he sees her lying as if dead and poisons himself. When Juliet awakes and finds Romeo dead she commits suicide using his sword. On learning of their deaths, the Capulet and Montague tribes agree to reach a truce to avoid any more deaths. This is the main plot of the play but there is also many subplots and additional characters. Romeo and Juliet was advertised as a tragedy in the Shakespearian times but many disagreements go on to argue whether or not Romeo and Juliet's deaths were a tragedy or merely unfortunate.

In drama, a tragedy is a play with an inevitable negative outcome. Something that is unforeseen by the characters, but which they cannot avoid-they seem to have no power over their fate. Also, in tragedies from Shakespeare's period, there are usually many deaths, including those of the protagonist (main character). We will now examine if Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy.

Essay writing services for how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy? papers

Shakespeare wrote many tragedies such as Anthony and Cleopatra, Hamlet and Macbeth. In these plays all the main characters die, and this was often the simplest way of indicating to the audience that the play was tragic. Death was also the easiest way of signifying the end of a characters story on stage. It is also important to consider that death was a massive part of the Elizabethan life with the plague and high mortality rates and short life spans. For this reason death was often teaching in tragedy. For example, Romeo and Juliet's deaths are seen as GOOD deaths because they died with integrity for love. This is shown by the talk of love and the kiss with which Romeo dies "Here's to my love!…Thus with a kiss I die" (v.iii.10).

The use of the Chorus in tragedy began in ancient Greece with the parts of the chorus representing female servants or villagers. They would sing and comment on the action on and off stage, they would seem to watch the play just like the audience, although they were also involved and could speak to characters and warn them or tell them off. In Romeo and Juliet the chorus at the beginning of Act is commenting on the action and warning of future danger. It is in beautiful verse but also serves to keep the audience up to date with the plot and also adds dramatic tension and foreboding of the play's sad and tragic ending; It says that Juliet does not have the means "to meet her new beloved any where" and refers to Romeo and Juliet being 'Foes'.

Another device used is that of revenger's tragedy. This is an old moral code whereby justice is served not by court and law but by people. Thus if someone wrongs you, you have the right to wrong them back. There is a lot of honour in this kind of revenge in Romeo and Juliet but this cycle of violence is what has kept the two families feuding. This is seen with Romeo killing Tybalt after Tybalt has killed Mercutio. Romeo says " My very friend, hath got this mortal hurt/ In my behalf; my reputation stained" (iii.i.10) showing that honour and reputation were very important. Shakespeare seems to be very clear in instructing the audience that this revenge justice is wrong as it does not help any of the characters and in fact makes things worse.

The deaths of Romeo and Juliet were a tragedy because they are shown to love each other truly, and were it not for their families being enemies they would be together. The play itself states "For never was a story of more woe/ Than this of Juliet and her Romeo"(v.iii.08). The couple tried to escape their fate, and stay together and this backfired leaving two young people dead. There is additional tragedy in the way Friar Lawrence's letter not arriving meant that Romeo killed himself because he did not have the correct information and believed Juliet already dead. Also very sad in this portrayal is that Juliet wakes so quickly after Romeo has died, if he had waited but a matter of minutes they could have been together. This is the effectness of good tragedy on an audience; it makes you wish you could do something to change the characters' fate, while the play is telling you that Romeo and Juliet's deaths were inevitable. The message of the play seems to be that you cannot help who you fall in love with-Juliet and Romeo fall in love although they are supposed to be sworn enemies. It shows that hatred is futile and unnecessary while love is real and should be cherished.

Additional factors in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet are the peripheral details that could have led to the lover's deaths. As has been previously discussed, the family feud, which was long running and based on long ago events, meant that Romeo and Juliet could not be together as they wished. Nothing good can come out of such a feud. Also the personalities of the individual characters could be seen as partially to blame. For instance both Romeo and Juliet had quite impulsive natures, Romeo in his rash killing of Tybalt, and Juliet in her rush to marry Romeo. You could also argue that their suicides were also impulsive decisions, with little thought before hand, which could have prevented the tragedy. An alternative factor could be the fact that Juliet's parents rushed forward her arranged marriage to Paris, aided by the Nurse who was often encouraging Juliet to marry. As an adult who was relatively aware of what was happening, the Nurse might have been able to intervene in the tragedy, yet she merely contributed. This could also be said of Friar Lawrence who agreed to marry the couple; if he had instead urged them to wait or if he had told their parents, the young lives may have been saved. Also, the fact that the Friar did not take Juliet's letter himself resulted in Romeo being unaware that Juliet was still alive and so ultimately resulted in Romeo's death, and thus Juliet's.

We have examined various characters and plots from Romeo and Juliet and the result is a tragedy on many levels. In the first instance the play makes the audience sad because of the tragic storyline, but also there are messages about fate-About how small decisions can have huge consequences. Although the play is a tragedy the ending is almost positive when the families have stopped blaming each other, in a way Romeo and Juliet's deaths have brought the families together. This is perhaps the biggest tragedy because if the families had been able to do this earlier, Romeo and Juliet would have been saved.

Please note that this sample paper on how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on how far were romeo and juliet's deaths a tragedy? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Social Lie in A Doll's House

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Social Lie in "A Doll's House". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Social Lie in "A Doll's House" paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Social Lie in "A Doll's House", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Social Lie in "A Doll's House" paper at

Our affordable prices!

Henrik Ibsen uses the "social lie" to govern the characters of "A Doll's House," to create a metaphorical gilded cage, that offers a false sense of security. Producing a persona to face society marked the "social lie" in the 100s. The cultural trends forced the public to live up to a social paradigm, while withholding their interior emotions and truths.

The characters or dolls appropriately referred to from Ibsens A Doll House were caught in this social lie and never really got to reveal themselves as real human beings. It seems that they would get so used to processing in their mind what everyone expects of them that eventually, it naturally would form a new layer or persona over them. Truth would inevitably prevail if this new persona did not exist. Perhaps they would finally get to express their true feelings or their aspirations that they would have hidden their whole lives. The social lie that the characters live in controls their every action, opinion, or basically their life. In this era you would live your life as a lie and never be true to yourself, but is it worth it, putting on a show? Doing what you have a passion for is what everyone should strive to achieve. You would never hold a true friendship; they would all be based on social standings, finances, or publicity. If this social lie were not hovering over this society, Nora would have expressed her true feelings or opinions a long time ago and perhaps never married Torvald. She would have grown on her own experiences based on her own opinions instead of her fathers. If this lie had not been governing their behavior, you would see the reality of life and how people actually are.

The public pretense in the early 100s was different from what it is now. To disclose reality would ruin the lives of many. Societal fabrication was a practice utilized by many in order to maintain a civic standard. The exposition of private matters ruining ones reputation is plausible. However in "A Doll's House" words, money and materialism were seen as a way to avoid the complications of personal contact. Upholding the "social lie" was more important than aiding a loved one. Materialism was more significant than people, leading Torvald to refuse to give himself up for Nora. Peaceable human interaction can occur without the "social lie." It is the community's responsibility to accept one another for who they are and not judge others only by their flaws.

"A Bird in a Guided Cage," by Arthur J. Lamb and Harry Von Tilzer, is analogous to "A Doll's House." A false sense of security is looming over those who live the "social lie," given that if the truth is revealed to others they will be ruined. Self-imprisonment illustrates the result of the "social lie." The chorus of "A Bird in a Gilded Cage" models the fact that Nora was literally trapped in domestic comfort. "She's only a bird in a gilded cage, a beautiful sight to see. You may think she's happy and free from care, She's not, though seems to be. 'Tis sad when you think of her wasted life for youth cannot mate with age; An her beauty was sold for an old man's gold, She's only a bird in a gilded cage."

College papers on The Social Lie in "A Doll's House"

Social expectations and conventions limited the lives of the characters in "A Doll's House." Their lives would have changed dramatically if the truth was revealed to the public and materialism did not play such a prominent role in their lives. The various names Torvald gives to Nora are diminutive in nature. It is noteworthy that they are less consistently animal and innocuous in nature. He calls her his "little rogue", "little skylark", "little person", "helpless little mortal", and maybe most unpleasant "child". Nora is the bird in a gilded cage and Torvald makes certain that she remains that way.

Please note that this sample paper on The Social Lie in "A Doll's House" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Social Lie in "A Doll's House", we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Social Lie in "A Doll's House" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler? paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler? paper at affordable prices !

Religion was a very important thing during the time of Queen Elizabeth I and Emperor Abu-ul-Fath Jalal ud-Din Muhammad Akbar of Mughal India.

Religion was a major issue for Elizabeth from the moment of her birth, which made her the Protestant heir to the throne in place of her Chatholic sister, Mary. Elizabeth was crowned Queen on Sunday 15th January 155. In the months that followed, Elizabeth re-established the Protestant Church in England. Perhaps to appease Catholics or to appease those who did not believe a woman could become head of the church, Elizabeth became Supreme Governor of the Church of England, rather than Supreme Head as her father had been. She was a committed Protestant, and spent time in prayer every day. She liked candles and crucifixes in her private chapel, liked church music, and enjoyed the more traditional style of worship. She did not like religious extremism and did not want to persecute any of her people for their religious beliefs. However, the tenacious political nature of the Catholic/Protestant split meant that her government had to take a harsher line towards Catholics than she wanted. Elizabeth ruled for thirty-four years and she was able to develop and use her skills as a ruler and women to create a strong sense of personal loyalty in her subjects. Each year she would visit the homes of her nobles. The people liked her so much.

Akbar the Great was a skilled leader. He was Muslim. He married a Hindu princess. Akbar tried to remove all the distinctions between the Muslims and non-Muslims. He even appointed Hindus to high posts. Akbar was a deeply spiritual man, but also a brutal warrior. Akbar believed in the policy of "universal peace," which accepted and appreciated the many different faiths of India. His people loved Akbar even though he was a Muslim and the country he ruled were loaded with Hindus.

Both Elizabeth and Akbar were successful leaders. Even though a rulers religious preference may be different from many of his/her subjects, there still can be unity in the Empire or country because if the King/Queen takes care of their people and doesn't cause much trouble, there can be peace.

Please note that this sample paper on Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Elizabeth and Akbar: The Religion of the Ruler? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!