Religion as I see It

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Religion as I see It. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Religion as I see It paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Religion as I see It, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Religion as I see It paper at

Our affordable prices!

Religion, as I see It A Life of Choices

Religion is a set of beliefs by which we understand our world and our tiny place in it. It is a set of beliefs that defines our culture and expectations, as well as our views of people and behaviors. Religion acknowledges a significant power outside us (God). It is a spiritual path that allows us to move outside of our day-to-day needs and demands and provides us with a view of our place in the larger picture. It permits us to see our lives, our endeavors, and ourselves as part of a whole world a tapestry of people, plans and creation. Faith, on the other hand, I believe is an organized group that thinks and feels the same way about religion. Catholicism would be an example of a faith, as would Buddhism and Judaism.

That I believe in God, Jesus, Mary and all the saints and apostles is an indisputable truth for me. I believe in the story of creation as written in Genesis. What I am not sure about with regard to the creation timing issue is that if God truly created our world in six days, as we know of the time frame of six days, where were the dinosaurs? Science has shown that dinosaurs were not around at the same time as man. The other timing issue I question is the issue of age. It is written in Genesis 514 that Cainan lived to be nine hundred and ten years, and I think to myself "How is this possible?" The only assumption I can come up with is that there was a completely different calendar in use at that time. So, while I believe in the stories as they were taught to me in Catholic schools, I do question some of their validity. We are, after all, reading stories that have been passed down through thousands of years by man and, in the retelling, things may have been changed.

The image of God is dealing with the non-physical part of us our soul. We get our drive for morality, ethics and our drive to make a difference from the soul, which is in the image of God. The God I envision is a God of compassion, a God of love, and he is our Father. I believe that he is an all-powerful, infinite, nonmaterial being that is all knowing and benevolent. During terrible times of crisis, people question that if there truly is a God, why does he let bad things happen to people? One of the greatest gifts given to us by God is our choice of free will. We choose our destiny it is not pre-ordained for us at birth. Along our path of life we make choices that continually alter our plans. These choices make things either worse or better for us. Man chooses whether to hurt another human being God does not "allow" him to choose that path man chooses.

Cheap essay writing service offers papers on Religion as I see It

A life of choices is a more meaningful life than a programmed life. If I am programmed to love a person, it is not as meaningful as choosing to love that person. Similarly, if I dont have the choice to do good, but am programmed to do good, then there is nothing meaningful about it. Whereas, if I have the capacity to do good or evil, then good becomes much more desirable and significant. But, with choices come consequences. Life is based on the decisions that human beings have made - and the consequences that flow from that (cause and effect).

The question of why bad things happen to good people is an issue that leads people to leave the life of living with a belief in God. People think that God allows bad things to happen, but it is not God it is people that do evil. We do evil perhaps because we want something so badly that we are willing to break any law to get it to hurt any person to get it. People today are not concerned with divine retribution. When people say that what they are telling is the truth, they say, "so help me God" or "may God strike me down" but they know God is not going to do anything to them right then, so they lie. What they do not take into account is their day of judgment. The day people day and are judged by God is when they will answer for their sins.

The issue of suffering can be approached from two directions from an intellectual perspective and from a suffering perspective. From an intellectual perspective, you must ask questions about the bad event. "If God is good, why did this happen to a good person?" "We are made in the image of God, so how could this have happened?" With regard to the suffering perspective, we are talking about people in emotional distress. They want so much to believe that God would not do this to their family that they forget God did not do it a person did.

For free choice to function, evil has to have the possibility of existing. If every time a person chose to do evil and God interfered, then there would be no moral choice.

If the lives of the righteous were clearly too perfect, that too would wipe out the possibility of choice. As imperfect as our world is today, our free will to choose our paths in life is what makes the life worth living. How to overcome the evil that crosses life's path is up to each person.

The choices we make are determined by our morals and ethics that we have learned from infancy. We learn that it is not "right" to steal, to lie, to swear, to covet that which is another's, and that we must honor God and honor our parents. These are our natural laws that have evolved from the divine laws of God. Every religion, every country, no matter who they profess to know as their God, has these same laws but perhaps in different wordings. In the end, they all come down to mean the same things. It is man that chooses not to follow the laws. Man becomes greedy for things that are not his and uses the gift of free will God gave him to steal from others, to cheat and lie and even to kill to get what he wants.

Every day I am guided in my actions by what was taught to me years ago, both at home and in the Catholic schools I attended. One of the easiest things for me to do was to honor and love my parents. If you were to know my upbringing, then you would wonder at this statement. Briefly, I grew up in a comfortable middle-class suburbia household where I was abused physically and mentally for years. The fifth commandment of God is "Honor thy Father and thy Mother." Because I firmly believe in God, in everything that God has in store for us, I try very hard to live by his laws, including this one. My parents needed the extra love I could give them because they were not lovable. I did not berate God for giving them to me as parents. He did not make them into who they are, did not encourage them to do evil they chose to.

As I get older and my family becomes larger with grandchildren, I try to teach them the stories I learned through the Church. That is my role in life now as a grandmother to spread the word of God to my grandchildren. I am not a perfect person now. I was not a perfect child. I simply do the best I can with the choices I make and their consequences while trying to live "the good life".

Please note that this sample paper on Religion as I see It is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Religion as I see It, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Religion as I see It will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Family as institution

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on family as institution. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality family as institution paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in family as institution, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your family as institution paper at

Our affordable prices!

Throughout the years much effort has been given to understanding the "family" and its role in society. With time, many changes have taken place in civilization that have affected and inevitably shaped the purpose of the family in the modern world. Today, structural functionalists believe that the functions of the traditional family have been taken over by other social institutions and, therefore, the family as an institution is "breaking down".

Although I understand that much change has taken place in the lifestyle and the structure of the family, I disagree with the above statement. I believe that today, more than ever, the family unit is the backbone of society and the most influential social institution in our culture.

There are two family functions that are of main importance 1) the primary socialization of children so that they can truly become members of the society into which they have been born, and ) the stabilization of the adult personalities of the society (Eshleman & Wilson, p.1).

Examining the first function of the family unit much data can be collected to support it. Our society has evolved to become high paced, always on the go and technology oriented. Today, in order to be successful, it is vital to become an independent thinker with strong beliefs. With overactive media it can be an overwhelming and a confusing process to undergo. In this culture family unit plays the most influential role in socializing children. It is the family unit, whether one or two parent, that is responsible for installing proper values in an individual and developing ideals and morals. Although in the past the family would spend more time together (working in the fields, maintaining a farm, or managing the family business), the time that the family spends together today, although lesser in its amount, is much more influential and beneficial in the socialization of children. Family is the only place where true emotions and feelings can be expressed and the mental support that a child requires obtained. It is the place where the strongest aspects of one's personality are influenced to develop. Today many other institutions (school, daycare, and sport clubs) are widely developed and often aid in the completion of the socializing process which the family initiates. This permits more time and energy to be spent by the family in establishing and developing the fundamental aspects of socialization process.

The second function of the family that is of great importance is the stabilization of the adult personalities of the society. In the past the incentive for marriage was mainly economics. The family unit was formed in order to create a financially stable environment. Emotional factors such as love, passion and romance had less importance. Today the main motive for creation of a family is love. It fulfills the basic human need of being cared for and creates a nurturing environment. Family is the prime stabilizer of the adult personality. By being accepted, supported, loved and understood, a person in turn becomes more secure in oneself and is able to cope with the pressure and demands of life more successfully. Many of the changes that have taken place in society over the years have had a positive outcome on the family life. Technological advances provide better lifestyle and allow for more quality time to be spent within the family. By having the time to deal with personal matters more stable adult personalities develop.

In conclusion it can be clearly seen that family remains the most important social institution in our culture.

Eshleman, J. Ross., and Susannah J. Wilson.

The Family. rd ed. Toronto Pearson Educational

Canada Inc., 001

Please note that this sample paper on family as institution is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on family as institution, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on family as institution will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace'

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace'. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace' paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace', therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace' paper at affordable prices !

Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace'

The opening lines of this play are in mid argument, between two slaves. A typical Greek comedy tactic, using slaves to provide humour- slaves which hate their owners. Now these slaves are doing a comical thing in rolling up poo into balls to feed a Dung beetle. Now this Dung beetle as expressed by the second slave is very picky with it's food and has a large appetite. The second slave is the one which is rolling the poo into buns, the one which has the worst job of kneading the poo all day so that the beetle will like it. The Dung beetle is getting hand made poo buns for it is a very important asset within this play. Trygaeus- the owner of the slaves- is planning on flying up to the Gods on the back of the beetle, calling it his 'hippo beetle'. The slaves mock Trygaeus for attempting to do this calling him a mad man, that he has a 'new kind of madness'. The slaves appear to think that Trygaeus will not be able to get up to the God's so make the audience laugh by giving them examples of his attempts, his failures (a great way to make your master look bad in front of the audience.) But to add more humour his comments are ridiculed by the fact that Trygaeus's attempt on Hippo beetle back is successful, thus making the slaves judgements incompetent. The slaves attempt again to make their master look bad by shouting his children and telling them that they are orphans, for their parent has left them alone, this should be looked as bad on Trygaeus's behalf. But once again the slaves are shown as funnily incompetent for the conversation between father and daughter shows that he has good reasons to go up to heaven, shows an understanding between the two.

Once Trygaeus reaches heaven after all his bother he is stopped by Hermes. This in itself is funny, for it after all the trouble nobody appreciates it. Also the attitude of Hermes is funny, for he goes completely over the top calling him a 'foul, shameless, desperate, good-for-nothing villain' and the 'villainists of villains'. After these accusations Trygeaus plays with his words for when Hermes asks him questions he simply answers 'villain', branded with the label given by Hermes. Also the humour of this is that Hermes attitude later is the opposite, for once he is given the offering of meat then Trygaeus is suddenly a 'poor fellow'. This in a way is mocking at the God's too, the fact that they could be bribed, shows that the God's are very shallow. But Aristophanes not only stops there at mocking the Gods, he also provides humour by painting an image of the Gods using ridiculous equipment such as; 'furniture, pots and pans'- perhaps suggesting that the God's are not all that they are cracked up to be, they need utensils which are the same as the mortals on Earth.

Aristophanes introduces the first manipulative language within the play to sway the audience to be against the wars, when Trygaeus first reaches heaven.. The drama of the play has began where the audience and Trygaeus is told that the Gods (Zeus) have left for they had enough of everyone praying to them to win the war, so moved as far away as they could. Thus letting War take over their old grounds and told to do as he wished. This resulted in War taking Peace and throwing her into a 'deep dark cave'. You also learn of the most disastrous prospect of the play, and of War. That the God War has bought 'a gigantic mortar', which War is going to 'pound every city in Greece to a pulp'. Surprisingly even at this moment of doom Aristophanes brings humour in by Trygaeus laughing at each City and its stereotypical food produce. For example Sicily- 'poor Island all grated up', he also makes it funny that Trygaeus should be worrying about how much some honey costs for a God- as if the God's need to watch their money. But alas a disaster there is no pestle- so creating a chance for humans to sort out the problem of war and save their cities- also it creates suspense- keeping audience interested. Neither place though that Havoc (another God) searches for a pestle has one. The Pestle could perhaps be symbolic for the Governors of either side. Both sides (Athenians and Spartans) had lost their general when fighting, resulting that both sides were just pointlessly fighting each other. This is a very good symbolic idea of Aristophanes, for it will subcontiously manipulate the more intelligent minds within the Greek audience- and generally the more intelligent were the more important and influential, hence the reason for realising that the war was pointless and should be stopped.

Trygaeus then calls all men of Greece to help and rescue Peace- for the good of their own cities and country. This brings all the people together-what Aristophanes wanted. The chorus call up the men of Greece- which is not heavy hearted instead Aristophanes attempts to bring across his message to the audience light heartedly, bringing in humour. Visual humour of the legs which cannot stop because they are to excited, about the prospect of peace. The audience looking upon the scene will want to be as excitable as the chorus are who cannot stop their legs from dancing.

After the call up of the men of Greece there is another incident between Hermes and Trygaeus- a rather pathetic attempt of Hermes to stop Trygaeus and the men from moving the stones from the pit Peace is locked up in. Once again the God's are mocked at by Trygaeus by asking Hermes after he condemns Trygaeus to death when the date of his death will exactly be. To persuade Hermes again Trygaeus flirtly compliments Hermes calling him the comic name of 'Hermikins'- Trygaeus then uses the chorus to compliment Hermes into not uncovering their actions to Zeus- I find it ironic though that the Gods are supposed to see everything which goes on around them but they cannot even see what is happening in their own home lands- perhaps showing incompetance again! This does not work too well though so Trygaeus tells Hermes of a conspiracy against them which makes Hermes afraid of his privilages position and starts paniking thinking that Trygaeus and men of Greece are their only salvation- a strange turn around from the people of Greece needing the God's, to the God's needing the people of Greece. But although Aristophanes is mocking the God's throughout the play he does still show some respect to them for after Hermes consent for the rescue of Peace te leader and Trygaeus pay their respects to Apollo asking him to bless them.

Although all the men of Greece are helping out there are many people not pulling their weight, Lamachus, Argives, Megarians and the Athenians. This I believe is a warning to the people of these nationalities not to provoke or create war. The reason, because peace will hate you and you will be beyond any hope- so to stop this from happening they should pull their weight now and work together to rescue her (peace).

Peace is eventually rescued.

Please note that this sample paper on Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace' is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace', we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Act One- Aristophanes 'Peace' will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

John smith and william bradford

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on john smith and william bradford. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality john smith and william bradford paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in john smith and william bradford, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your john smith and william bradford paper at

Our affordable prices!

John and Will

Who was John Smith and how was he depicted in history? According to his third

person memoirs, the General History , he was a hard working, courageous explorer who

founded Jamestown despite misfortune. On the other hand William Bradford was a deeply

College Essays on john smith and william bradford

religious pilgrim who wrote the Plymouth Plantation In both accounts however the two

men sailed across the Atlantic looking for a new world. When looking closer at what

these two men did when they arrived in America we find that they have some close

similarities as well as some differences.

John Smith was a was an English soldier and adventurer. He played a Vital role in

the founding of Virginia and New England. Smith Sailed in a squadron of three ships that

established the first permanent English settlement colony in America. On the other hand

William Bradford sailed to America on the mayflower in 160 and helped in the founding

of Plymouth. Both men had different colonies but were similar in the fact they both helped

in the founding of a colony.

Smith And William Bradford were similar in who they gave credit to when they

first landed and that was that they both thanked God for their good fortune and health.

John Smith believed that God mullified the hearts of the Indians so that they would help

the settlers rather than attack them. Similarly, William Bradford, when coming onto shore

for the first time, fell to his knees and thanked God for all that he had done for them on

their voyage. The two men gave God all the credit for everything that they received.

Smith and Bradford differed in their reasoning for coming to America in that Smith

wanted to explore the Earth and that Bradford wanted to escape the persecution of the

English. It can be summed up that they differed from each other in their reasons for

leaving their homeland as well as their actions when landing in the new world.

In conclusion, the way that John Smith is portrayed in history is greatly different

then that of William Bradford but on the other hand they have some close similarities that

allow them both to be called founding fathers of America.

Please note that this sample paper on john smith and william bradford is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on john smith and william bradford, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on john smith and william bradford will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism?

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism? paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism? paper at

Our affordable prices!

Nationalism was one of the profound causes of the First World War. In the 1th and 0th centuries, an air of intense nationalism permeated Europe, slowly infecting all who lived on the continent. Nationalism is the strong feeling of pride, loyalty and support for one's nation. During the late 1th century to early 0th century, there was an outbreak of aggressive nationalism, where many nationalists took their beliefs up one step further, to the extreme. These radical groups believed that their nation was the richest, most powerful and most important nation in the world and they wanted desperately for their nation to be recognized as such. This feeling of nationalism was in essence the spark that set Europe at war, for it was this belief that led to the assassination of the Archduke, Franz Ferdinand. Nationalism also caused or played part in many incidents that contributed to the start of the War. Amongst them were the Balkan wars, the arms race and the build up of the alliance systems. Nationalism also nurtured the drive for prestige and vengeance between the European powers. In short, nationalism further escalated the tension that contributed to the outbreak of war.

Nationalism didn't just influence the middle class; it influenced people of all ages and societies. The governments realized the power which nationalism held, it was able to encourage public support for military buildups and for a country's use of force to achieve its goal. Militarism controlled the thinking of many European leaders in the period before World War 1. They believed that the use of force could solve problems amongst nations and that the military strength of one country reflected the importance and power of the nation. However, to increase the military budget, the government had to increase the taxes. Therefore to avoid civil unrest, the excuse for the increase in taxes was to display the importance and power of the nation. In 188, Germany began to challenge Britain's dominance of the seas; hence Britain challenged Germany to an arms race. The arms race in essence was driven by nationalism, for neither powers wanted to give in and be second to the other. For each believed that they were the best, and their military strength must show that they are the best. Both Germany and Britain ended up with navies so large and powerful, that there was no use for their military strength unless a war broke out. Nationalism encouraged public support all over Europe, for military buildups and for the nation to use force to reach its goals.

Nationalism in the Balkan states played a huge part in the building of tensions amongst the great powers of Europe, especially between Austria-Hungary and Russia. The Balkan Peninsula was then under the rule of the Ottoman Empire. It consisted of proud ethnic groups whom did not wish to be ruled by any authority other than themselves, they desired independence and were eager for the chance to revolt. In 1878, at the decline of the Turkish Empire, the Balkan nationalists with the help of Russia were able to overthrow the Turkish government. The rebellion eventually resulted in the emergence of many independent Balkan states; the major ones were Serbia, Montenegro, Rumania and Greece. The absence of a power in such an economical and territorial significant area attracted many European powers to the Balkans. Russia hoped to gain control of the straits. Austria-Hungary wanted to control the Balkans and restrain the Balkan nationalists, for they feared that the nationalists would set a bad example for Austria-Hungary's own racial minorities. This conflict of interests increased the tensions between Russia and Austria-Hungary, but was set to rest in a pretence truce. Soon Serbia became the major power in the Balkans. Austria-Hungary felt threatened by the growing power of the Serbs and wished to crush them before it was too late. The Serbs, however, were now a very proud race, they didn't want to be ruled by anybody else, furthermore they wanted the unification of all Slavs. Serbian nationalists despised the thought that fellow Slavs, like their Bosnian brothers were under Austro-Hungary rule and wished to set them free. Hence, on June the 4th, 114, a young Serbian nationalist assassinated the heir to the Austrian-Hungarian throne Archduke Franz Ferdinand. By doing so, this young nationalist has lit the fuse to set the whole of Europe at war.

As Europe enters the 0th century, the European powers began to feel more and more insecure. Both France and Russia were filled with nationalists who couldn't forget the humiliation of the previous century. France had nationalists marching about Paris demanding for vengeance of the loss of Alsace and Lorraine to Germany in 1871. Whilst the Russian nationalists urged their government to regain prestige after the loss to the Japanese in the Russo-Japanese war of 105. In Austria-Hungary, the tension was worst. With the minority groups under her reign adopting the idea of national independence and the Slavic groups growing more and more restive, Austria-Hungary found it hard to keep her monarchy together. The growing tensions both within each power and amongst the powers caused all the countries to feel insecure and vulnerable. The solution to this was the treaty systems. The great European Powers thought that alliances would ensure the safety of themselves and peace in Europe. However the opposite was achieved, the alliance system pulled each and everyone of the European powers into War.

Online writing services offer help on To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism?

Nationalism, though not the sole cause of World War One, blew up the tension that existed in Europe and had influence in causing World War One. It created public support to one's nation that didn't exist before; it enabled governments to know that they can depend on their people if in the event of war. Nationalism was also a contributing factor to the drawing of the alliance systems, for not one country felt safe alone especially when the majority of countries were increasing their military powers. Finally nationalism created some extent of civil unrest amongst great powers such as Austria-Hungary, where their monarchy consisted of so many different minority groups. Essentially, nationalism was the pinprick which popped the balloon of tension that existed in Europe, it was the reason which a fiery young man by the name of Princip assassinated the heir to the Austrian throne. In doing so, setting the whole of Europe at war.

Please note that this sample paper on To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism?, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on To what extent can it be argued that WW1 was caused by nationalism? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!