What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes? paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes? paper at


Our affordable prices!


In the times of oppression during World War many individuals lost their lives due to their lost of hope of survival. But for all its seeming cruelty, there were signs of "human behaviours" in a few individuals that assisted Elie to maintain his humanity. It was this and his close relationship with his father, as they support one another that saw Elie develop a strong desire to live essential in his quest for survival.


It was the help that Elie received from his father that played an integral part of Elie's survival. From his loyalty and love for his son, Chlomo helped Elie cope with pain and suffering in the abrasive conditions of the concentration camps. From the beginning when Elie's shock witness at the ruthless slaughter of innocent babies he held onto his father's 'familiar hand,' the one that he could seek comfort and reassurance from. As their journeys became harsh and brutal where they were forced to carry out rigorous labour in order to live, his father goes to a great length to conserve Elie's physical strength. This was apparent when Chlomo had pretended not to be hungry and offered his ration to Elie. Chlomo's action was commendable done from his love for Elie, as a son, and his responsibility to protect him. In effect, Elie came out to have sufficient strength to continue on with his life. Not only did Chlomo helped maintain Elie's physical strength, but also rescued his life in a numerous occasions. This was exemplified when Elie began to fall asleep in the bitter cold atmosphere on the ground Chlomo cried, "Don't let yourself be overcome Elizer…..You might sleep for good." With his persistence, Elie woke up from the dead. In addition, during his transport to a camp on a cattle wagon Elie felt a person's hands on his throat suffocating him. Immediately, his father came to the rescue when he was aware of the incident and instantly removed the prisoner. Chlomo's paternal protection of Elie proved to be fundamental to his survival.


However, when his father grew weaker, Elie's 'natural' instinct forced him to nurture his father, in which he was able to develop a strong, purposeful desire to live. The strong love and connectedness between them helped Elie emerge as stronger and resilient character. This was apparent during the march of Gleiwitiz, where the presence of Chlomo was the only thing that had stopped Elie from 'sliding to the edge of the road.' Elie felt he had an obligation to support his father. Thus, Elie had to survive with a power of will. 'What would he do without me? I was his only support,' he said, 'this was not time to be separated. As his relationship with his father grew, Elie's willpower to survive grew. Elie gave up his ration for his father when his father was in desperate need of food. It was Elie's love that helped him persevere to slap Chlomo from unconsciousness on the cattle wagon. Elie saw the true worth of his father. Unlike 'sons abandoning their father without tears,' Elie recognised that the connectedness and love shared between them had helped him survived the bestial brutality.


Although dehumanisation saw many prisoners being totally indifferent and selfish, there were individuals who offered support to Elie's journey to survive. At Birkenau, kindness saw a prisoner risk his own well-being to advise Elie and his father to change their ages, preventing both being cremated. The advice that the young Polish did offered "provided the first human words' for new prisoners, provided optimism towards the future. The head of the block offered sage advice on how to pass the selection test. Even in times of oppression, a French girl jeopardised her own life to help Elie and Juliek who played his violin to help Elie keep in touch with his 'human behaviours.' These 'human behaviours' exhibit in a few individuals were sufficient to encourage Elie continue to strive for survival in times of privation.


In spite of dire circumstances for the Jews and others in the camps, there were a glimpse of kindness and human spirit seen. The people who helped Elie made him see that evil cannot conquer the resilience of human spirit. In doing so, coupled with the support of his father, Elie was encouraged to see his life to come through the inhumane conditions of the concentration camps, in which he did.


Please note that this sample paper on What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on What changes Elie from the devout believer he is at the start of the text to the spiritually empty person he becomes? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Arches Across the World!

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Arches Across the World!. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Arches Across the World! paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Arches Across the World!, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Arches Across the World! paper at


Our affordable prices!


Arches Across the World!


Introduction


According to Robert Templer McDonalds opened its 5,000th branch recently! Anthropologists Find McDonalds May Deserve More Respect in Asia, WSJ Interactive Edition). He also reported that the giant fast food firm began operation in its


117th country. With such international presence it is little wonder that Ronald and the rest of the McDonalds crew pose such a ripe target to foes of globalization. This case study explores two globalization issues that McDonalds success highlights competition and culture.


Online essay help on Arches Across the World!


Assignment


Based on the information in the Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition article cited below, class discussion, and other sources address the following questions in an essay. Be sure to provide references in a generally accepted format, and be sure to find outside sources (i.e., beyond material introduced through the course). Keep in mind that this assignment is worth 50 points.


1. From the point of view that McDonald's spreading throughout the world is an example of competition in action, discuss the competitive atmosphere that might attract McDonalds into a new area and how that competitive atmosphere might change after McDonalds arrives. (Be sure to consider comparative advantage.)


. Now assess the impact McDonalds has on local culture and the impact local culture has on McDonalds. Include an explanation of the role competition has in this cultural interplay.


[NOTE The competition and culture issues addressed in this case also exist in the more traditional concept of international trade when goods or services are produced in one country and sold in another. In both situations Adam Smiths phrase the invisible hand might come into play.]


Wall Street Journal Reference


Templer, Robert. Anthropologists Find McDonalds May Deserve More Respect in Asia. Wall Street Journal


Interactive Edition. September 10, 1.


(http//interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB6077155758.djm)


Other Globalization articles


[The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition]


July 16, 1


Business and Finance - Asia


Indonesian Retail Group Gets Upset


Over Influx of Big French Markets


By JEREMY WAGSTAFF


Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


TWO RIVAL FRENCH hypermarket chains are aggressively expanding in


Indonesia, despite the dire economy, and a local retailers group is crying foul.


In the past nine months, Carrefour SA has opened one emporium in Jakarta and says it plans at least two more this year. Promodes SA already has two Continent stores here, one of which opened just this week.


They sell everything from chilis to high-fidelity systems, dwarfing local rivals and drawing big crowds. Continents flagship in the Kuningan business district is regularly packed. Neither company will release figures, but both say they are happy with their performance so far.


Its a bold move, coming so close on the heels of last years violent looting sprees in Jakarta, which left many shops and malls smoldering.


Indeed, the Carrefour store was partly looted in November, a month after it opened.


The Indonesian Retailers Association, Aprindo, says the giants represent unfair competition in a languishing market. Its executive director, Kustarjono Prodjolalito, also claims they are winning customers by selling products below cost in some cases. He fears a price war that may crush smaller retailers.


Its going to put competition within a three- to five-kilometer radius out of business, says Mr. Kustarjono, adding, Its unfair.


CARREFOUR and Continent deny they sell below cost.


We dont know what theyre talking about, says Handi Liem of Carrefour. But the government may be taking action anyway. The local media reported last week that city retail-trade officials plan to update regulations, to maintain fair business practices among local businessmen. The officials didnt return calls seeking comment.


At least one high-profile U.S. predecessor in the market had a rough time. The U.S. retail chain Wal-Mart Stores Inc. ended a franchise agreement in Indonesia last year, after less than two years, due to weak sales and a row with its local partner, a unit of the Lippo Group, over royalty fees and capital. Other companies such as wholesaler Makro, operated through an advisory contract with local company PT Karabha Unggul by SHV Holdings NV of the Netherlands, have avoided head-on competition with city-center retailers by setting up operations on the edge of cities, rather than in the heart of them, like the hypermarkets have.


Both French companies say their Indonesia strategies were laid in the years before economic crisis hit in mid-17. From 1 to 16, retail sales rose an average 0% a year, says Aprindo. Last year, however, sales fell somewhere between 0% and 0%, compared with the most recent precrisis year, 16. In addition, Indonesias middle class -- the hypermarkets target market -- has been hardest hit, according to World Bank figures.


The November looting raised alarm bells at Carrefour and jeopardized its expansion plans, according to an executive close to the company. The management was traumatized by the looting, says the executive. Once committed to a city, however, theres an inexorable logic to expansion. The big stores produce economies of scale only after a company has opened four in one city, according to Johnny Widjaja, president commissioner of Carrefours local partner, PT Tigaraksa Satria.


AND NOT ALL local retailing organizations are unwelcoming. At a meeting of several associations this month to discuss the issue, the invitees fell short of agreeing with Aprindo to push for a government prohibition on more hypermarkets.


Im happy, actually, because were a distributor and we need the business, says H.A. Parwennei, chairman of the Indonesian Supplier and


Distributor Association.


Syahrir Tanjung, who heads PD Pasar Jaya, a state company running the citys traditional markets, denies any serious effect on his thousands of stall-holders. The problem is how to make competition without killing each other, he says.


Both companies have tried to keep a low profile, and in fact, their managers havent joined Aprindo, says Mr. Kustarjono. The managers declined to comment for this article.


Shifting consumer habits here arent anything new, of course. When supermarket chain PT Hero Supermarket opened its doors in Jakarta in the early 170s, there was widespread fear other supermarkets and traditional markets would be goners, says Mr. Tanjung of PD Pasar Jaya. Not so. They suffered a bit, but just created more competition, he says.


Despite his hypermarket hostility, Aprindos Mr. Kustarjono has passed onto his members several tricks he says he spotted on spying trips to Continent and Carrefour. One of them Shrink-wrap packs of two chicken drumsticks -- its a convenient size for Indonesias growing ranks of divorcees, he says.


We have to follow the changes, he says, adding, We should learn how to be more efficient.


-- Special correspondent Rin Hindryati contributed to this article


------------------------------------------------------------------------


URL for this Article


http//interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB06458580885.djm


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Copyright 000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your Subscription Agreement and copyright laws.


For information about subscribing, go to http//wsj.com


[The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition]


July 8, 1


International Commentary


The Americanization


Of European Business


By Geoffrey Owen, a senior fellow at the Institute of Management, London School of Economics. He was editor of the Financial Times from 181 to


10.


The political and economic integration of Western Europe is often seen, especially in Britain, as leading inexorably to more regulation of business, higher social costs and more onerous labor laws--all of which are likely to put European companies at a disadvantage vis-a-vis their American competitors. Yet a remarkable feature of the European corporate scene today is the extent to which American ideas and business practices are gaining ground.


This is most clearly seen in the wave of restructuring that is altering the shape and ownership of several major industries. The current takeover battle in France between TotalFina and Elf Aquitaine, following closely on Olivettis sensational victory in the battle for Telecom Italia, is the most recent example of the kind of activity that would have been virtually unthinkable 0 years ago. In many of these cases, the participants are being advised by American investment banks and American lawyers.


The restructuring process is driven by international competition and an increasingly demanding capital market. On both fronts, European integration is providing an additional spur. The arrival of the euro will tend to eliminate pricing differences between member countries, while making it easier for investors to treat Europe as a unified capital market. Steelmaking, for example, once the most nationalistic of industries, is beginning to acquire a global character as more companies seek to strengthen their market position through cross-border acquisitions and joint ventures. The proposed merger between British Steel and Hoogovens of the Netherlands is motivated partly by the quest for cost savings and partly by the need to offer a better service to customers, such as the car manufacturers, which are themselves operating on a European scale. At the same time, the merging companies are under pressure to offer to their shareholders returns that at least match those available on comparable investments in the U.S.


Thanks in large part to former prime minister Margaret Thatcher, Britain started down this path earlier than other European countries. The severe recession of the early 180s, together with the pro-competitive policies pursued by successive Conservative governments, forced British companies to come to grips with their internal weaknesses, raise their performance levels closer to the best international standards and align their strategies to the needs of the world market.


The rehabilitation of British Steel, once the most inefficient steelmaker in Europe, is rightly regarded as a triumph for Thatcherism, but similar, if less publicized, transformations took place in many other firms. The general trend then was toward specialization and internationalization--focusing on businesses that could hold their own on the world stage, and getting out of those that could not. In some sectors, such as television sets and automobiles, gaps left by uncompetitive British firms were filled by foreign companies which built or acquired factories in Britain.


Thatcherism was unique to Britain, a reflection of the dire state into which the country had fallen in the second half of the 170s. But similar forces have been at work in other parts of Europe, not least in Germany. During the 160s and 170s much of German industry was characterized by widely diversified companies that were more interested in top-line growth--a continuing expansion of sales and employment--than in bottom-line performance.


For a mixture of reasons, including the need to satisfy their increasingly numerous non-German shareholders, several of these companies have now drastically revised their strategies. The most celebrated example is the conversion of Hoechst, one of the big three chemical companies, from a chemical conglomerate into a narrowly focused life sciences firm. This has involved a complex series of acquisitions and divestments, culminating in the merger with Rhone-Poulenc of France to form Aventis, which will become one of the worlds largest pharmaceutical manufacturers. The ultimate success of this operation remains uncertain, but what Hoechst has done illustrates the willingness of even the most securely established German firms to make a radical break with their past.


No less significant was last years decision by Siemens, which was incurring heavy losses in semiconductors, to hive off this business into a separately quoted company. The management of Siemens had long argued that vertical integration--making electronic components as well as finished equipment such as computers and telephone exchanges--was an essential part of its strategy. What this meant in practice was that the loss-making semiconductor business was subsidized by the more profitable divisions, dragging down the performance of the group as a whole. This might have been acceptable when shareholders were passive and capital markets quiescent, but those days are over and Siemens has been forced to respond.


Hoechst, Siemens and a growing number of other German companies have embraced (with varying degrees of enthusiasm) the Anglo-American concept of shareholder value as the primary measure of corporate performance. One of the role models for Juergen Schrempp when he took over as chairman of Daimler-Benz in 15 was Jack Welch of General Electric, which had consistently achieved a return on equity of around 0%. As a first step, Mr. Schrempp insisted that every business within Daimler-Benz must aim for a return on equity of at least 1%. The culture change which Mr. Schrempp engineered in Daimler-Benz helped to pave the way for this years merger with Chrysler.


Daimler-Benz, which was in a state of crisis at the time of Mr. Schrempps appointment, may be something of an exception, and there are still many obstacles--in Germany and elsewhere--which are likely to slow down the Americanization process. Despite the Olivetti/Telecom Italia and Total/Elf affairs, hostile takeover bids are still rare on the Continent. The furious political and trade union reaction to Krupps hostile bid for Thyssen in 17 showed the strength of Germanys attachment to the consensual model of industrial change. But the fact that the bid was made (with American investment banks playing an important role) was a sign of how far thinking in German boardrooms had moved in the American direction. Moreover, even though the bid was withdrawn, it led to an agreed merger between the two companies, facilitating a much-needed rationalization of the German steel industry.


Powerful German trade unions undoubtedly will exert a brake on the speed with which the restructuring of firms and industries can take place. But there is a degree of realism among German union leaders which was notably lacking in their British counterparts during the 160s and 170s. Many German companies have been able to negotiate far-reaching changes in working practices without the kind of confrontation with employees that took place in Britain during the Thatcherite 180s. A strong incentive for the unions to cooperate is the ease with which German companies can shift manufacturing operations to lower-cost locations outside Germany.


Another obstacle to change has been the desire by European governments to protect their national champions from foreign takeovers, but here, too, there are encouraging signs of greater flexibility. France, traditionally the most dirigiste of the larger European countries and the most restrictive in its policy on inward investment, has moved a long way in recent years. For example, the French authorities have not opposed the Hoechst/Rhone Poulenc merger, nor have they sought to impose conditions on it.


How far this French tolerance might extend to more sensitive industries remains an open question. The appearance of a foreign white knight in the Total/Elf situation would probably not be greeted with great enthusiasm in Paris, and the same might apply to any outside intervention in the battle currently underway for control of the countrys leading banks. Finance Minister Dominique Strauss-Kahn has already said he would like to see the restructuring of the banking industry remain, at least for now, a franco-francais affair.


But there is a growing recognition, even in an industry as intimately linked to national sovereignty as aerospace, that old-style nationalism is incompatible with global competitiveness. Aerospatiale, the leading aerospace firm, has already been privatized, and it is a reasonable bet that, despite the current stalemate between the partners, Airbus Industrie will in due course become a normal, shareholder-owned company, just like its main competitor in the U.S.


What business can do in the way of restructuring is limited by the social and economic climate in which it operates. And there is an obvious danger that the center-left governments which hold sway in several European countries will, in the interests of social solidarity, impose new restrictions on managers freedom of maneuver. But there are powerful economic forces working for greater liberalization. The tide of Americanization is running strongly, and governments would be well advised not to stand in its way.


--From The Wall Street Journal Europe


------------------------------------------------------------------------


URL for this Article


http//interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB1145507851875.djm


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Copyright 000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your Subscription Agreement and copyright laws.


For information about subscribing, go to http//wsj.com


Please note that this sample paper on Arches Across the World! is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Arches Across the World!, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Arches Across the World! will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


A Code Hero-Santiago

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Code Hero-Santiago. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Code Hero-Santiago paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Code Hero-Santiago, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Code Hero-Santiago paper at


Our affordable prices!


A Code Hero


Ernest Hemingway developed a new type of hero that is portrayed in many of his novels. This type of hero is classified as a code hero and this title is given to Santiago in The Old Man and the Sea. Santiago portrays all the qualities that are needed to be a code hero. He is a man of action, he has specific concepts about death, he shows grace under pressure, and he never acts cowardly. The character of Santiago in the novel The Old Man and the Sea can be classified as a Hemingway code hero.


First, Santiago meets the qualification of a code hero because he is a man of action. His initiative is evident when he goes alone to sea. Manolin asks Santiago if he could go with him out to sea. Santiago tells the boy "you're with a lucky boat. Stay with them" (10). This quote exemplifies that Santiago is a man of action because he goes out to sea by himself, even though he knows there is a risk involved with his decision. Another example that shows Santiago is a man of action is when he fights off the sharks while he is at sea. He hit the sharks "solidly and from as high up as he could raise the club. This time he felt the bone at the base of the brain and he hit him again in the same place" (114). This quote is an example that Santiago is a man of action because he attacks the sharks ferociously. Most people act cowardly when a shark even comes near them. A man of action will jump at the opportunity to defend something that is rightfully his.


Second, Santiago meets the qualification of a code hero because he has a specific attitude towards death. One example from the novel that exemplifies this characteristic is when Santiago first hooks his great fish. He promises the fish "I will kill you dead before this day ends" (54). This quote exemplifies that Santiago believes that death is necessary. He makes a promise to the fish that no matter what, he will kill him. Santiago also thinks death is inevitable. He tells the fish that he is going to have to die anyway, but does he have to kill him too ()? This quote exemplifies his ideas that death is going to have to happen to everyone. He knows that death can happen at any time, but will it happen while he is at sea.


Cheap writing services for A Code Hero-Santiago papers


Third, Santiago meets the qualification of a code hero because he shows grace under pressure. He shows this characteristic when he is catching the marlin. Santiago promises to say his prayers if the Lord allows him to catch the fish. He promises "I will say ten Our Fathers and ten Hail Marys [if] I should catch this fish" (64-65). Even though there is a possibility this huge catch could ruin him, Santiago does not get frantic over the situation. He calmly promises to say many prayers if he catches the fish. A second example that exemplifies that Santiago shows grace under pressure is when he continues to bring the fish into port, even though it has been completely destroyed by the sharks. After the sharks had mutilated his magnificent fish, he does not pay any attention to the sharks that still were striking the carcass. "He did not pay any attention to anything except steering. He only noticed how lightly and how well the skiff sailed now [that] there was no great weight beside her" (11). Most people who lose something that they have worked hard for will get really upset. Santiago is in a type of daze and the only thing he notices is how easily his skiff moves through the water.


The fourth characteristic of Santiago that makes him a code hero is he never acts cowardly. This characteristic is best portrayed when he goes out to sea so far that he cannot see the lights of shore. On the second night of his escapade, he notices they were "moving more slowly now and the glow of Havana was not so strong" (47). The glow coming from lights on the shore serves as a safe haven for anyone who is at sea. A cowardly person would most likely turn back towards shore if its lights were no longer visible. The disappearance of the lights does not phase Santiago. He continues on being pulled by the fish because he knows that losing the glow from the shore means he must be traveling eastward, and he just needs to go in the opposite direction to get back home. Another example that shows Santiago never acts cowardly is when he is pulling in the 1800-pound marlin from the sea. The extensive strain from this task causes his hands to get mushy from the rope cutting into is hands "and he could only see well in flashes" (114). This quote exemplifies that Santiago never acts cowardly because he wants to bring the fish in, even though it is hazardous to his health.


In conclusion, the character of Santiago in the novel The Old Man and the Sea can be classified as a Hemingway code hero. He is a man of action, he has specific thoughts about death, he shows grace under pressure, and he never acts cowardly; all of which are essential for a character to be classified as a code hero. Santiago is an excellent example of a Hemingway code hero.


Please note that this sample paper on A Code Hero-Santiago is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Code Hero-Santiago, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on A Code Hero-Santiago will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Mrs.johnson

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on mrs.johnson. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality mrs.johnson paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in mrs.johnson, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your mrs.johnson paper at


Our affordable prices!


Mrs. Johnson is the Younger family's annoying neighbor. She is very nosy and always in their business. The family doesn't really like her and is very offended by her. She doesn't have very good manners. She acts like she's the family's


friend when she actually isn't.


When Mrs. Johnson first comes in the scene the author describes her as a "woman who decided long ago to be enthusiastic about EVERYTHING in life


and is inclined to wave her wrist vigorously at the height of her exclamatory


Online essay help on mrs.johnson


comments. When she starts talking we find out that she's not a nice person, on


the contrary she's very nosy. She is trying to get all the juicy gossip she can get


out of the Youngers, while acting like she's their friend. When she's having a


dialogue with Mama she says things like "I mean sometimes He works in


mysterious ways…be He works, don't He!" and "I'm just sooooo happy for ya'll". And this here child (About Ruth) looks like she could just pop open with


happiness, don't she." She is trying to act like she's just having a casual


conversation with Mama, but she's actually trying to find out everything she can about the family's business. Oleander is really beautiful flower, but on the inside


it's poisonous. Mrs. Johnson is exactly like that. On the outside she looks like a very nice and happy person, but as can be seen she's very nosy and vulgar.


Mrs. Johnson is very jealous of the Youngers. She reacted to them


moving in a house by saying "Lord I bet this time next month ya'll's names will have been in the paper plenty (Holding up her hands to mark off each word in


the headline she can see in front of her) " NERGOS INVADE CLYBOURNE


PARK BOMBED!" Only someone who is jealous of the family would say


something like that. She probably said it to make them think twice before moving in the house. If oleander could think and have feelings it would be jealous of all


the other flowers because people pick them, conversely everyone tries to stay


away from oleander.


Mrs. Johnson thinks that's she's being sleek by acting like she's the


Yougers' best friend, " (Reaching out quickly, playfully, and patting Ruth's


stomach) Ain't you starting to poke out none yet! (She mugs with delight at the


over familiar remark and her eyes dart around looking at the crates and packing


preparation; Mama's face is cold sheet of endurance.)" The family can see right


through that, " if there are two things we, as people have to overcome, one is the Ku Klux Klan and the other is Mrs. Johnson". They know that Mrs. Johnson


actually couldn't care less about them. No matter how pretty oleander is people who know anything about it know that it is a very poisonous plant. Likewise,


anyone who actually knows Mrs. Johnson knows that she's not sweet and


innocent.


All in all like Mrs. Johnson is nosy, offensive, impolite, and vulgar. People are annoyed and offended by her. Without a doubt the Younders are happy to


move out of the apartment and not have to see her any more.


Please note that this sample paper on mrs.johnson is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on mrs.johnson, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on mrs.johnson will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770?

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770? paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770? paper at


Our affordable prices!


In order to answer this question we must assess the extent to which the English were outside the normal constraints of civil and criminal law. So we must look at the nature of authority , how this authority/power was used and how the authority was look upon by the different members of class.Once this has been done we will come to the conclusion that to a certain extent the English were ungovernable due to the above factors. In 1660 it was a significant time because the puritan ideological of the commonwealth dissolved itself and the monarch was restored by Charles II who used the arms of the law to exercise his power .At the time the court system was seen as the states main body of power. There was a slight problem in that not all classes/social groups were instutionalised by the legal process especially people who lived in remote areas or who worked in remote jobs and even the people that were institualised by the legal system had problems with what they saw as what should and shouldn't be law.


Historically there is two stances of opinon on the above question, yes England was a governable and no England was ungovernable. We will see that J.A Sharpe has the view that the English during the period 1660 -1750 in majority were governable J. A . Sharpe believes this to be the case because of the way in which the legal systems functions were operated and the way in which parishes dealt with crime and because by the early 17th century England had moved away from a freudual system and had started to move towards a capitalist system . The wealthy yeomans and land owners could now be identify with the rich nobility of England than it could with that of the landless labourer and poor man.. This was important because inturn it effected the nature of crime and who committed the crime The crime in medieval England was that of violently bloody crimes committed by that of the nobility but from 1660 the gentry were more less likely to comitte a crime than that of the poor man , but according to J. A .Sharpe this was suppressed through the convention of the poor law.


The legal system at the time was established to stop violent and bloody retribution between parties. It also in theory was the way in which central government would enforce it's authority. It did this through it's courts and it's judges the court system would excute the state law and the judges would keep the king's peace by enforcing punishment on those who broke the rules; but in reality it was not the actually justices of peace nor was it the courts that enforced the state laws and kept the king's peace it was actually the job of the inferior officers such as the parish constable."despite the attention given by historians to the justices of the peace, and the praise generally lavished upon the incumbents of that office ,most of the daily round of county adminstaration and law enforcement was carried out by inferior officers within the parish." J.A.Sharpe 'Crime In Early Modern England 1550-1750' Longman second edition pp107.


The parish constable was the local inferior officer who usually came from richer offices usually from a neighbouring town/village. His loyalities were to the monarch but also to that of the parish. Therefore the constables duties at times would be to mediate between the actual statues and the actually parishes customs but some times this could clash '…We find constables bound over for failing or refusing to report religious conventicles' ." J.A.Sharpe 'Crime In Early Modern England 1550-1750'longman second edition pg107. 'Quarter sessions Records, Trinity 168 to Epiphany 160 ed. H. C. Johnson, Warwickshire County Records, 8, 15, pp 0,1,18,15,7,57.' Other duties they also would have to implentment was village rituals and festivities.


College Essays on How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770?


On the whole constables where valuable in keeping England govern due because ethey were local they bridiged the gap in culture differences between the wealthy yeoman/land owners and the landless labourers/poor members of the parishes as they where a tool of the legal system in controlling the ever growing gap between the different parties of the parish.


The opinion of crime was more a nuisances to a community and the actual usage of a court was majority of the time last resort but it was used 'Of the permanent local residents who came to trial, 68 per cent were convicted; of the outsiders, per cent…..servants tired….status of being somewhere between established residents and total outsiders 88 per cent of them convicted' J.A.Sharpe 'Crime In Early Modern England 1550-1750' Longman second edition pp107.


Firstly before a person of the commiunty was even tired at a court the parish would log written and verbal complicates to the person, perhaps deal with the person via the poor law .Failing that they would then use a local courts such as the leet court or archdeacon's this was to gain a local involvement and a speedy trail . If the person carried on after the local courts and persisted then they would be taken to the assize court. Usually if the person went to assize courts and they were members of the local community and of status , other good members would ask the courts for lenicey. ' Thomas west….provoked an imposing display of solidarity on his behalf ffrom respectable elements of the parish'. J.A.Sharpe 'Crime In Early Modern England 1550-1750' Longman second edition pp107. The parish in most incidents dealt with crime in a community way , either by sorting it out by themselves or by actually taking local legal action . With this approach it didn't iradicate criminal offences but it did n't emphathy them either , so even though there were offences taking place overall the parishes were governable due to the fact that constanst perpatratiors were accepted by the comminuty


Another important method in the late 17th century was the poor law . Due to a increase in population from 1550-1750 and poor crop it left a large social group the poor members of society to look for a other alternative to beable to eat and to make money. So it was felt if there was to be alternative means to control and relinkwish the desire for the people to comitte crime, this was done through the poor law. The actual mechanism of this was the invention of workhouses.The poor would be expected to support themselves by work.


Obvicously this belief is not shared with all historians , on the other side of the coin historians who believe that England during the period of 1660-1750 England was ungovernable and put that down partly due to the uneven authority and due to isolation of certain social groups it meant that they weren't colonizised by the legal syatem. Such group that was chastised as been a unlawless group pf society was either people that resided in foresty areas or miners . People from foresty area were seen as been lawless due to the lack of colonisatistaion of the noblebity , churches and lack of a legal strong foothold. Miners on the were also seen as a solidarity body that worked in a united corpation method. Miners were also isolated from the normal social institutes culturally and phisycally.


John Brewer and John Styles support there view by studying the miners in the period of 1660-1750 especailly a group of miners that lived in the kingswoods forest which was situated outside of the city of Bristol. The Kingwood forest in the 18th century was renouned as the most unmangerable area in England due to the coutinueous conflict the miners had with the crown and land owners . The Miners played a important role in providing coal to function Bristols industry and domestic lifestyle . The first major incident arose in 177 between the collies and the authorities because the conditions of the roads of Bristol had become a state. So in febuary 177 two parties had drawen up petitions addressing the House of Commons with regards to the state of the roads to get a act passed to refurbish the roads. The results were that in April 4th 177 two turnpike acts The Bristol act (1 Geo.I C.1) and the Studley Bridge Toghill Act (1 Geo.I C.1) Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries. - London Hutchinson, 180. - ((Hutchinson University library) with royal assents had been passed to set up tolls to levy on 1 roads leading out of Bristol. These levy were to apply to all road users. The acts were mange by a tolls trustees which out of 146 there were 6 large landowners named . As soon as the first day of collection of the tolls on 6th June 177 the colliers demonstrated there disapproval and opposition ' assembled in body, and pulled down 4 of [turnpikes]…some of them which they set fire' Farley's Bristol journal 1 July 17 Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180. - ((Hutchinson University library) and using what necessary force to bring them down. Within that same week the miners marched into the city of Bristol ' with clubs and staves in a noisy manner;according to the mayor of Bristol' Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180. - ((Hutchinson University library). This made the mayor nervous and so troops were sent in to catch the colliers but only 4 prisoners were caught. So in July 177 the colliers sent a letter addressing the issues to the king and the underlinging problems wasn't the actual taxation but they were distressed by the power in which was given to the trustees 'to remove furze and heth from any common land' Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180- ((Hutchinson University library). they were upset that a balance would be upset by the medaling of the trustees such as the heth which was used as fire wood and to graze there horses. Secondaly they were upset that they had to pay a levy for the roads when infact they belived it to be the trustees fault for the conditions of the road and thirdly they believed it was also the failure of the magristrates to enforce the law to get the roads fixed in the first place. Overall the colliers felt that the authority had negelected to act properly and that the King wouldn't have passed such an act against them.By late 177 the 4 collier prisoners were tired at the assizes court and aqucuttied due to lack of evidence and the colliers were subdied. As result of the colliers taking action in th May the Studley Bridge trustees petitioned parlimentant for a effective puninshment as the Bristol Act were ambigoust as it didn't state a punishment which meant that the gentry didn't know how to or what under to proscute any one found damging the tolls. So weeks later a new act was introduced ' I Geo.II C.1' Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180- ((Hutchinson University library). Which stated that for first offence if found to be destroying a tollgate then they would be imprisoned in the gaol for months and publically whipped and for a second offence they would be sent to do 7 years of transportation . Then in !71 the actually Bristol Act was amend to a change of how the admistration of the trustees was ran and a clause that allowed any animal carrying coal to go through free of charge. This meant that the authorities only answered one of the colliers grievances and the road had even been fixed either.


So in 171 when the trustees began to erect the tollgates again on the roads to Bristol colliers and countrymen began to destroy the tolls once again. June 0th 171 Some colliers were destroying a toll when a gang led by William Blaithwaite the Justice of Peace stop them in there tracks and took 4 prisoners to his home. What the colliers did afterwards displays the mentality the colliers had for the law and the weakness of the law .Before Blaithwaite took the prisoners to the gaol he came under siege from the colliers threathening to destroy his house if he didn't release 'their brethren'Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180. - ((Hutchinson University library). in which Braithwaite released the prisoners . That summer the authorities were unable to excess size any of the law and no prosecutes were made against the colliers . still unhappy with the present climate gentry petitioned for further advancement s of punishment to be made so in may 17 the result was a new act was passed 5 Geo. II c. which stated anyperson convicted of destroying a turnpike would in affect be transported for seven years. With this new harish law in August 17 trustees of the Studley Bridge-Tpghill began to erect toll-gates which resulted in ' a party of Bristol colliers arm'd with axes ….cut down the turnpike….without any oppsitition' Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180- (Hutchinson University library). The consequesnces of the colliers actions lead to prisoners taken and in 17 a enomurous amount of effocet to gain a conviction against the colliers was taken. At the Salisbury assizes court colliers were convicted and sentenced to transportation this was only possible via the determation of one Roger Hollands who infact had played a important role in attending the toll-gate Acts in parliament. This incident made a clear statement to people that the law if stood strong could achieve a positive and just outcome. The following years the turnpike issue subsided. It wasn't until 1740 where the colliers involved majorly involved in another riot . Due to a price war between the owners of the coal mines they plan on reducing miners wages by a 5% decrease so they striked and stop working. The colliers didn't just stop work they also made sure that coal couldn't leave Bristol and they also organised a strike collection of food and money from non miners. They began there strike in th October and in the next 4 days they wreaked havoc ' procession of colliers through Bristol hallowimg and shouting…robberies on the highway' Brewer, J & Styles J. (eds), An ungovernable people the English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth Centuries London Hutchinson, 180- ((Hutchinson University library). So the authorise worried wrote to the secretary of state to arrange emergency coal and guard . Within a week it was all over and coal began to be brought back into the city and evictence was been collected against the rioters so they could be made of examples. But in November troops were situated on the eastern boarder to prevent a resuce mission to break a pitman free. The colliers took no direct action due to the troops and April 17 there were 6 warrents issued for the arrest of colliers who took part in the October riot but no evendice to suggest that any were tired nor is there any evidence that the pitman was prosecuted either.


Even though the colliers took part in other riots they either didn't orcherstrate the riot they just tagged along 174 the sommerset turnpikes or when it came to actually using direct action in 1740 possible food riot they are deterred by the force of soldiers. The only time the colliers of kingswood united was when they felt that the authority wasn't doing it's job properly such as in the case of the turnpikes the colliers felt it was down to the authority to sort the roads out and so they went looking for redress of grievances and make the authority accountable to by addressing there disagreement.


Inconclusion J.A Sharpe argument is correct to say that England was fairly govern because it had a hierarch of gentry to establish and enforce the laws due to the coming of the large cultural and social gap that was becoming apparent from the early 17th century. John Brewer and John Styles were also correct in there argument that England was ungovernable due to the lack of colozisation of institutes such as churches and even the gentry were sparse in Kingswood . Even though both arguments are correct I think England was governable because with in time Kingswood would have it's first church and there was a present of authority but it wasn't rooted authority and there was no social and cultural diversity between the community ,so I think such incidents that happen in Kingswood were probably isolated incidents and didn't generally spring up all over England due to the evidence that J.A Sharpe presents about community morale.


Please note that this sample paper on How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770?, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on How far were English people 'ungovernable' in the period 1660-1770? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!